Alnadwah
International Conference on Syariah, Law and Science (CFORSJ i-CONF) - CFORSJ Procedia

KEPERLUAN UJIAN BERTULIS DAN TEMUDUGA DALAM PELANTIKAN PEGUAM SYARIE: ANALISIS DAN CADANGAN

Date Published : 15 December 2025

Contributors

Abdul Karim Ibrahim

Author

Amirah Aqilah Mohd Zin

Author

Hasnizam Hashim

Author

Mohd Sabree Nasri

Author

Keywords

Pelantikan Peguam Syarie Ujian Bertulis Temuduga Ketidakselarasan Penyeragaman Mahkamah Syariah

Proceeding

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): CFORSJ Procedia

Track

Article

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Abdul Karim Ibrahim; Amirah Aqilah Mohd Zin; Hasnizam Hashim; Mohd Sabree Nasri;

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Kajian ini meneliti keperluan pelaksanaan ujian bertulis dan temuduga dalam proses pelantikan peguam syarie di Malaysia. Profesion guaman syarie memainkan peranan penting dalam memastikan hak-hak pihak berkenaan di Mahkamah Syariah terpelihara serta keadilan ditegakkan berasaskan hukum syarak. Walau bagaimanapun, ketidakselarasan syarat kelayakan ujian bertulis dan temuduga antara negeri menimbulkan isu standard penilaian yang berbeza serta menyukarkan mobiliti peguam syarie untuk beramal di pelbagai negeri. Persoalan utama yang timbul ialah sama ada perlu diwujudkan sistem penyeragaman bagi meningkatkan integriti profesion guaman syarie serta keyakinan masyarakat terhadap institusi kehakiman Islam. Oleh itu, objektif kajian ini adalah untuk mengenal pasti konsep pelantikan peguam syarie menurut undang-undang dan prinsip Islam, menilai pelaksanaan semasa ujian bertulis dan temuduga, serta mencadangkan penambahbaikan terhadap ketidakselarasan yang wujud. Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif berbentuk doktrinal melalui analisis kepustakaan terhadap enakmen, kaedah pelantikan, buku, artikel, dan jurnal akademik. Di samping itu, kaedah temubual separa berstruktur turut dijalankan bagi memperoleh pandangan empirikal daripada pegawai dan pengamal undang-undang syariah. Hasil kajian menunjukkan wujudnya perbezaan ketara antara negeri dalam menetapkan syarat ujian dan temuduga yang memberi kesan kepada tahap keseragaman penilaian serta menimbulkan kekeliruan dalam kalangan calon. Kajian ini mencadangkan garis panduan penyeragaman meliputi aspek pemarkahan, kandungan ujian, kategori calon yang perlu menduduki ujian bertulis, serta penerbitan bank soalan terdahulu sebagai rujukan rasmi. Secara keseluruhan, kajian ini menyumbang kepada pengukuhan sistem pelantikan peguam syarie yang lebih telus dan seragam di seluruh negara tanpa menjejaskan bidang kuasa negeri. Kesimpulannya, penyeragaman dianggap langkah penting bagi memastikan profesion peguam syarie terus berwibawa, dihormati, dan menjadi teras keadilan dalam sistem perundangan Islam Malaysia.

 

This study examines the need to implement written examinations and interviews in the appointment process of syarie lawyers in Malaysia. The syarie legal profession plays a crucial role in safeguarding the rights of relevant parties in the Syariah Courts and in upholding justice based on Islamic law. However, inconsistencies in the qualification requirements for written examinations and interviews across different states have given rise to issues of unequal assessment standards and have hindered the mobility of syarie lawyers to practise in multiple states. The central issue addressed in this study is whether a standardised system should be established to enhance the integrity of the syarie legal profession and strengthen public confidence in Islamic judicial institutions. Accordingly, the objectives of this study are to identify the concept of syarie lawyer appointment according to legal provisions and Islamic principles, to evaluate the current implementation of written examinations and interviews, and to propose improvements to address existing inconsistencies. This study adopts a qualitative doctrinal approach through library-based analysis of enactments, appointment procedures, books, articles, and academic journals. In addition, semi-structured interviews were conducted to obtain empirical insights from officers and practitioners in the field of Syariah law. The findings reveal significant differences among states in determining examination and interview requirements, which affect the uniformity of assessment standards and create confusion among candidates. The study proposes the development of standardised guidelines covering assessment criteria, examination content, categories of candidates required to sit for written examinations, and the publication of a repository of past examination questions as an official reference. Overall, this study contributes to strengthening a more transparent and uniform appointment system for syarie lawyers nationwide without undermining state jurisdiction. In conclusion, standardisation is regarded as a vital measure to ensure that the syarie legal profession remains credible, respected, and central to the administration of justice within Malaysia’s Islamic legal system.

References

Abdullah, A., Marzouk, M., & Abubakr, A. (2021). [Details unavailable—cited in-text].
Abdul Halim El-Muhammady. (2006). Undang-undang muamalat dan aplikasinya kepada produk perbankan Islam. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Abdul Karim Zaidan. (1997). Nizam al-qadha’ fi al-Syariah al-Islamiyyah (3rd ed.). Risalah Publisher.
Abidah Abkadir. (2023). Konsep kepercayaan dan pengurusan zakat. https://doi.org/10.55573/JOSSR.062101
Abu, N. S., Mohamed, D., & Beshlawy, E. (2015). Mandibular ramus and gonial angle measurements as predictors of sex and age. Journal of Forensic Research, 6(5).
Adams, D. C., Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. E. (2013). A field comes of age: Geometric morphometrics in the 21st century. Hystrix, 24(1), 7–14.
Afkaaruna, W. S. H. (2022). Cryptocurrency in the perspective of Maqasid al-Shariah. https://doi.org/10.18196/afkaruna.v18i1.14164
Al-Fayyumi. (1926). Al-Misbah al-Munir. Al-Matba‘at al-Amiriyyah.
Ali, Z. M., Samiun, H. A., Ahmad, S., & Zain, M. N. M. (2016). Peranan pemerintah dalam pengurusan zakat. Jurnal Hadhari, 8(2), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.17576/jh-2017-0802-02
Al-Qaradawi, Y. (1999). Fiqh al-Zakat. Dar al-Tawbah.
Al-Quran.
Alreshidi, E., Ahmad, A., & Akintoye, A. (2021). Collaborative cloud-BIM. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(8), 04021074.
Awang, M. (1900). Peranan peguam syarie di dalam sistem pentadbiran kehakiman Islam di Malaysia (pp. 1–49).
Begić, H., et al. (2022). Automation and robotics adoption challenges. Automation in Construction, 142, 104492.
Beaini, T. L., et al. (2015). Human identification through frontal sinus 3D superimposition. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 36, 63–69.
Bookstein, F. L. (2007). Landmark methods for forms without landmarks. Medical Image Analysis, 1(3), 225–243.
Buck, T. J., & Vidarsdottir, U. S. (2004). Race identification in sub-adult skeletons. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 49(6), 1159–1164.
Cattaneo, C. (2007). Forensic anthropology developments. Forensic Science International, 165, 185–193.
Çağlayan, F., et al. (2014). Morphometric evaluation of the mental foramen. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 25(6).
Chole, R. H., et al. (2013). Mandible anatomy association. ISRN Radiology, 1–4.
Deng, X., Zhao, X., & Zhang, L. (2022). ICT-enabled knowledge management. Journal of Management in Engineering, 38(4), 04022034.
Deng, F., et al. (2016). Forensic age estimation from knee MRI. Forensic Science International, 268, 145–150.
Diyah Amalia, I., & Widodo, H. (2024). Pembagian harta waris cryptocurrency. Posita, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.52029/pjhki.v2i1.156
Enakmen Pentadbiran Agama Islam Negeri Johor 2003.
Enakmen Pentadbiran Agama Islam Negeri Melaka 2002.
Fan, F., et al. (2016). Age estimation on hand radiographs. Forensic Science International, 271, 113–119.
Faizi. (2023). Are cryptocurrencies haram? AL-IHKAM Journal. https://ejournal.iainmadura.ac.id
Fatimah Hj. Mohd Nong v Mohd Azmi Mohd Yaacob [2011] 1 CLJ SYA 285.
Filograna, L., et al. (2010). CT virtual autopsy. Forensic Science International, 195(1–3), e13–e17.
Floriane, A., et al. (2016). Biometric method for age estimation. Forensic Science International, 271, 113–119.
Franklin, D. (2010). Forensic age estimation. Legal Medicine, 12(1), 1–7.
Galić, M., et al. (2022). KM discontinuity in project industries. Construction Management and Economics, 40(6).
Halim, A. H., & Bustami, T. A. A. (2017). Pelaksanaan hibah amanah. Kanun, 29(2), 310–335.
Harvati, K., et al. (2017). Mandibular shape morphometrics. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 131(3), 368–383.
Higgins, P. O. (2000). Morphological variation studies. Journal of Anatomy, 197(1), 103–120.
Huda, N., et al. (2012). Keuangan publik Islami. Kencana.
Hosseini, M. R., Edwards, D. J., & Martek, I. (2023). Barriers to KM tech adoption. Journal of Building Engineering, 68, 106210.
Ibn Faris. (1969). Mu‘jam al-Maqayis al-Lughat. Maktabah al-Babi al-Halabi.
Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah. (1961). Al-Turuq al-Hukmiyyah fi Siyasah al-Syar‘iyyah. Mu’assasat al-‘Arabiyyah.
Ismail, R. (2022). Pelaksanaan hibah amanah dan hibah harta bercagar (Doctoral dissertation, UKM).
Itabashi, H. H., et al. (2007). Miscellaneous forensic neuropathology topics. In Forensic Neuropathology (pp. 443–464).
Jariah Yahya v Nor Hasiah Harun [2010] 3 LNS 19.
Kamarudin, M. K., Zaman, N., & Razak, R. M. (2019). Thematic analysis of hibah necessity. al-Qanatir, 16(1).
Kaedah-Kaedah Peguam Syarie Negeri Johor 2015.
Kamali, M. H. (1999). Uncertainty and risk-taking (Gharar) in Islamic law. IIUM Law Journal, 7(2).
Kano, T., et al. (2015). CT morphometry for sex discrimination. Legal Medicine, 17(3), 167–171.
Katuk, N., Wahab, N. A., & Kamis, N. S. (2022). Cryptocurrency estate planning. Digital Policy, Regulation & Governance, 25(4), 325.
Keen, J. A. (1945). A study of the angle of mandible. Journal of Dental Research, 24, 77–86.
Klingenberg, C. P. (2013). Visualizations in morphometrics. Hystrix, 24(1), 15–24.
Laher, A. E., et al. (2016). Ultrasonographic position of mental foramen. JCDR, 10(6), OC23–OC27.
Lilianita, D., & Muchlisin, S. (2019). Transparensi dana zakat. Jurnal Syarikah, 5(1).
MacLeod, N. (2013). Landmarks & semilandmarks. Palaeontological Association Newsletter, 82, 1–9.
Marzouk, M., & Abubakr, A. (2020). Digital transformation drivers. International Journal of Construction Management.
Melaka Hari Ini. (2024, May 23). Tambah peguam syarie tingkat kualiti Mahkamah Syariah. https://www.melakahariini.my
Mitteroecker, P., & Gunz, P. (2009). Advances in morphometrics. Evolutionary Biology, 36(2), 235–247.
Mohamad, H., et al. (2019). Peguam syarie in Malaysia. 25(2019), 25–48.
Mohamed, P. D. S. D. A. A. A. (2020). Syarie legal profession (Act 166).
Monnazzi, M. S., et al. (2012). Mandibular foramen anatomy. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 41(1), 74–78.
Muda, M. Z., Rosdi, N., & Said, N. L. (2023). Legal analysis of trust hibah. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 23.
Musa Awang. (2017). Peguam Syarie di Malaysia: Realiti & prospek. Seminar Kebangsaan Mahkamah Syariah.
Mutis, I., & Hartmann, T. (2021). Digitalisation and KM gap. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 47, 101225.
Naji, K. K., et al. (2024). Organizational readiness factors. BEPAM, 14(1).
Nakajima, S., & Osato, S. (2013). Gonial angle association. Annals of Anatomy, 195(6), 533–538.
Norliza, N., & Wahab, N. A. (2022). Cryptocurrency estate planning. Digital Policy & Governance, 25(4).
Nurfadhilah, I. R., & Sasongko, C. (2019). Web-based accountability for zakat. APBEC 2018.
Ogawa, Y., et al. (2013). Sex estimation in Japanese skulls. Journal of Forensic Legal Medicine, 20(4), 234–238.
Opoku, D., Perera, S., & Osei-Kyei, R. (2022). Digital twins in built environment. ITcon, 27, 340–363.
Othman, N. S. (2021). Penghakiman hakim syarie dalam kes hibah bersyarat (Doctoral dissertation, UKM).
Othman, N. S., et al. (2017). Conditional hibah cases. Islamiyyat, 39(2), 135–142.
Pusat Zakat. (2019). Indeks Transparansi Organisasi Pengelola Zakat. Puskas BAZNAS.
Ruder, T. D., et al. (2016). Validation of post-mortem dental CT. JFRI, 5, 25–30.
Rupa, K. R., et al. (2015). Gonial angle as sex determinant. IJCMR, 4(2), 111–116.
Ruzman, M. N. (2007). Pembuktian harta sepencarian. Jurnal Syariah, 15(1), 13.
Said, N. L. M., Awang, M. R., & Nor, A. H. M. (2012). Conditional hibah in Jordan. Jurnal Syariah, 20(3), 309–328.
Saadan, M. K. K., & Batcho, F. K. B. (2022). Faraid aset digital. MFIFC Proceedings.
Satoshi Nakamoto. (2025). Bitcoin information. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/satoshi-nakamoto.asp
Serenko, A. (2021). Future of knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(8), 1773–1790.
Shahin, K. A., et al. (2013). Craniofacial imaging in forensics. JFRI, 1(2), 56–62.
Syams al-Din al-Khatib al-Syarbini. (2000). Mughni al-Muhtaj (Vol. 2). Dar al-Kotob al-Ilmiyah.
Torres, J., et al. (2024). Task–technology fit for digital twins. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.
Umar Dhahi. (2024). Adakah mata wang digital halal atau haram? https://daman.reviews
Wilayah Persekutuan. (1997). Akta Keterangan Mahkamah Syariah 1997 (Akta 561).
Zaher, M., et al. (2023). Digital maturity in UAE construction. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 12(3).
Zulfakar Ramlee Saad. (2015). Pembuktian dalam kes jenayah Syariah. Jurnal Kanun, 1, 122–141.

Downloads

How to Cite

Abdul Karim Ibrahim, A. K. I., Amirah Aqilah Mohd Zin, A. A. M. Z., Hasnizam , H. ., & Mohd Sabree Nasri, M. S. N. (2025). KEPERLUAN UJIAN BERTULIS DAN TEMUDUGA DALAM PELANTIKAN PEGUAM SYARIE: ANALISIS DAN CADANGAN . International Conference on Syariah, Law and Science (CFORSJ I-CONF) - CFORSJ Procedia, 3(1), 182-198. https://alnadwah.usim.edu.my/cforsjprocedia/paper/view/210