STRENGTHENING THE INTEGRITY OF DIGITAL EVIDENCE IN SYARIAH CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS: A FORENSIC–LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE CHAIN OF CUSTODY (CoC)


Date Published : 11 December 2025

Contributors

Mohamad Aniq Aiman Alias

Author

Wan Abdul Fattah Wan Ismail

Author

Ahmad Syukran Baharuddin

Author

Hasnizam Hashim

Author

Tuan Muhammad Faris Hamzi Tuan Ibrahim

Author

Keywords

Digital evidence syariah criminal proceedings forensic chain of custody (CoC) integrity

Proceeding

Track

Article

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Mohamad Aniq Aiman Alias; Wan Abdul Fattah Wan Ismail; Ahmad Syukran Baharuddin; Hasnizam Hashim; Tuan Muhammad Faris Hamzi Tuan Ibrahim;

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The rapid development of digital technology has significantly transformed the methods of collecting, managing, and evaluating evidence in Syariah criminal proceedings in Malaysia. Electronic evidence—such as messages, digital images, CCTV recordings, metadata, and communication logs—has become an increasingly primary source in the investigation and prosecution of Syariah offences. However, its volatile, easily altered, and highly manipulable nature raises serious concerns regarding authenticity, reliability, and overall evidentiary integrity. The absence of specific statutory provisions on digital evidence under the Syariah Court Evidence Act 1997 [Act 561] further creates a regulatory gap that heightens the potential for shubuhāt (doubt) during the evidentiary process. This article examines how the Chain of Custody (CoC) for digital evidence can serve as an effective forensic–legal framework to enhance the integrity of electronic evidence in Syariah criminal proceedings. Employing a qualitative approach through doctrinal analysis of legal documents and related literature, the study organises its findings according to key analytical themes. The results indicate that the CoC provides a robust scientific and procedural foundation to ensure that digital evidence is handled transparently, accountably, and free from risks of manipulation. The principles underpinning the CoC also align with the Syariah requirements of thubut (certainty of proof), amanah (proper preservation and stewardship of evidence), and ‘adl (justice), thereby making it a relevant mechanism for enhancing the admissibility and probative strength of digital evidence before the Syariah courts. This study contributes to strengthening the evidentiary framework in Syariah law by offering a scientific, forensic, and legal basis for more organised, consistent, and integrity-focused management of digital evidence. The findings further open avenues for the development of Syariah Digital Evidence Guidelines, capacity-building in digital forensic skills among enforcement officers and prosecutors, and further research into automated evidence management mechanisms within the Syariah judicial ecosystem.

References

Alias, M. A. A., Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Baharuddin, A. S., & Abdul Mutalib, L. (2021). Legal analysis of Syariah court evidence law on digital document as evidence and its admissibility in court proceedings: Analisis perundangan bagi undang-undang keterangan mahkamah syariah terhadap dokumen digital sebagai kaedah pembuktian dan kebolehterimaannya dalam prosiding mahkamah. Journal of Management and Muamalah , 11(2), 54 - 64.
Alias, M. A. A., Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Baharuddin, A. S., & Mallow, M. S.(2024a). Wasa’il ithbat dalam undang-undang keterangan Islam: Analisis perundangan terhadap kebolehterimaan dokumen elektronik di Mahkamah Syariah Malaysia: Means of proof in Islamic law of evidence: A legal analysis of the admissibility of electronic documents in Malaysian Syariah courts. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 12(3), 689-700.
Alias, M. A. A., Mohd Jailani, M. R., Wan Ismail, W. A. F., & Baharuddin, A. S. (2024b). The integration of five main goals of shariah in the production of science and technology for human well-being. AL-MAQASID: The International Journal of Maqasid Studies and Advanced Islamic Research, 5(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.55265/al-maqasid.v5i1.79
Aubin, M. (2025, July 17). “Types of digital evidence”. https://srecon.com/types-of-digital-evidence/
Mohd Kamil, K. M., Yahya, M. A., Mohd Arif, M. I. A., Mohd Shariff, A. A., Hassan@Yahya, M. S., & Adenan, F. (2025). Application of qarinah and cyber document evidence in deviant teaching cases: Aplikasi qarinah dan keterangan dokumen siber dalam kes ajaran sesat. Al-Qanatir: International Journal of Islamic Studies, 34(04), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.64757/alqanatir.2025.3404/1234
Mohd Shariff, A. A., Yahya, M. A., Tzu-Hsin, M. H., Mohd Subki, M. M., Azahari, N. F., Raja, J., & Muhamad, S. S. (2022). Prinsip rantaian jagaan dan rantaian keterangan: Keperluan kepada pengiktirafan dan pengaplikasian dalam kes syariah di Malaysia. Journal of Muwafaqat, 5(1), 17-32.
Narasimhan, P. & Kala, N. (2024). Ensuring the integrity of digital evidence: The role of the chain of custody in digital forensics. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 10(6), 2438-2450.
Nath, S., Summers, K., Baek, J., & Ahn, G. J. (2024). Digital evidence chain of custody: Navigating new realities of digital forensics. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems, and Applications, (pp. 11-20).
Stoykova, R. (2021). Digital evidence: Unaddressed threats to fairness and the presumption of innocence. Computer Law & Security Review, 42, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105575
Tuan Ibrahim, T. M. F. H., Alias, M. A. A., Nor Muhamad, N. H., & Baharuddin, A. S. (2025). Pembuktian forensik digital di mahkamah syariah: Kerangka kebolehterimaan dan integriti dalam jenayah syariah: Digital forensics in the shariah court: Framework of evidentiary admissibility and integrity in syariah criminal law. Journal of Muwafaqat, 8(2), 78–100. https://doi.org/10.53840/muwafaqat.v8i2.197
Watson, D., & Jones, A. (2013). Digital forensics processing and procedures. Elsevier.
Yahya, M. A., Mohd. Shariff, A. A., & Khalid, N. S. (2024). Proses pengumpulan keterangan dokumen elektronik. Penerbit UKM.
Yahya, M. A., Mohd. Shariff, A. A., & Saifuddin, S. (2023). Application of principles of chain of evidence and chain of custody during storage and forensic examination of electronic documentary evidence in Shariah criminal cases in Malaysia. IIUM Law Journal, 31, 145-166.

Downloads

How to Cite

Mohamad Aniq Aiman, M. A. A., Wan Abdul Fattah, W. A. F., Ahmad Syukran, A. S., Hasnizam , H. ., & Tuan Muhammad Faris Hamzi, T. M. F. H. (2025). STRENGTHENING THE INTEGRITY OF DIGITAL EVIDENCE IN SYARIAH CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS: A FORENSIC–LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE CHAIN OF CUSTODY (CoC). International Conference on Syariah, Law and Science (CFORSJ I-CONF) - CFORSJ Procedia, 3(1), 128-135. https://alnadwah.usim.edu.my/cforsjprocedia/paper/view/205