الآثار القانونية للصلح الجزائي في القانون الإماراتي


Date Published : 10 December 2024

Contributors

Ali Khalfan Hasan Alnaqbi

Author

Norfadhilah Mohamad Ali

Author

Hendun Abd. Rahman Shah

Author

Keywords

Legal effects Reconciliation Ciminal law UAE law

Proceeding

Track

Article

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Ali Khalfan Hasan Alnaqbi; Norfadhilah Mohamad Ali; Hendun Abd. Rahman Shah;

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Penal conciliation in general is a tool for the expiration of the criminal case or the suspension of the execution of the judgment and the avoidance of the issuance of a penal judgment in the criminal incident. legally in the narrow sense, the penal conciliation is a legal, procedural, voluntary action from two sides on which the law produces effects, and the will is involved in determining these effects, which are the expiration of the state’s authority to punish and the expiration of the criminal case or the suspension of the execution of the judgment. Conciliation may be made in respect of it. It is the trial court that exercises this right, regardless of the legal description of the incident contained in the indictment, the indictment, or the complaint summons. For the validity of the conciliation, it is required that it be in place of a crime that was actually committed, so every crime that is not proven with certainty is excluded from the scope of the criminal conciliation, and it also excludes every crime that has been extinguished by prescription or by one of the other causes of lapse, such as a general amnesty, since conciliation only responds to an existing crime at the time of agreement on it. And the penal conciliation expires by which all the effects of the judgment issued by the criminal case, whether they are principal, accessory or supplementary penalties, or any other penal effects other than confiscation, and the court may make the stay of execution include any subsidiary penalty except for confiscation Penal conciliation takes place by submitting a request to prove conciliation to the Public Prosecution or the court in crimes in which conciliation may be made between the accused and the victim or his private agent. Therefore, the request to prove conciliation may not be accepted to the Public Prosecution or the court, as the case may be, unless the request is submitted by those who are legally authorized to do so.

References

Aḥmad Fatḥī Surūr (1990). Al-Jarāʾim al-Ḍarībīyah.
Aḥmad Fatḥī Surūr (1990). Al-Jarāʾim al-Ḍarībīyah wa al-Naqdīyah, Al-Ṭabʿah al-Ūlá. Maktabat al-Nahḍah al-Miṣrīyah.
ʿAbd al-Amīr al-ʿAkīlī (1977). Uṣūl al-Ijrāʾāt al-Jināʾīyah fī Qānūn Uṣūl al-Muḥākamāt al-Jazāʾīyah al-ʿIrāqī. Al-Ṭabʿah al-Thāniyah. Maṭbaʿat Jāmiʿat Baghdād.
ʿAbd al-Rāziq al-Mawāfī (2010). Sharḥ Qānūn al-ʿUqūbāt li-Dawlat al-Imārāt. Maʿhad Dubayy al-Qaḍāʾī.
ʿAbd al-Rāziq al-Mawāfī (2016). Sharḥ Qānūn Mukāfaḥat Jarāʾim Taqniyat al-Maʿlūmāt. Maʿhad Dubayy al-Qaḍāʾī.
Amin Muṣṭafá Muḥammad (2012). Inqiḍāʾ al-Daʿwá al-Jināʾīyah bil-Ṣulḥ fī Qānūn al-Ijrāʾāt al-Jināʾīyah. Dār al-Maṭbūʿāt al-Jāmiʿīyah, Alexandria.
Anīs Ḥasīb al-Maḥlawī (2011). Al-Ṣulḥ wa Atharuh fī al-ʿUqūbah wa al-Khuṣūmah al-Jināʾīyah. Dār al-Fikr al-Jāmiʿī, Alexandria.
Bahāʾ Jihād Muḥammad al-Madhūn (2018). Al-Ṣulḥ al-Jināʾī fī al-Jināyāt Wifqan li-Qānūn al-Ṣulḥ al-Jināʾī al-Filasṭīnī Muqāranatan bi-al-Sharīʿah al-Islāmīyah: Dirāsah Taḥlīlīyah Muqāranah. Master’s Thesis, Faculty of Sharia and Law, Islamic University, Gaza.
Dr. Edwār Ghālī al-Dhahabī (1990). Al-Ijrāʾāt al-Jināʾīyah fī al-Tashrīʿ al-Miṣrī, Al-Ṭabʿah al-Thāniyah. Maktabat Gharīb, Cairo.
Dr. Fawzīyah ʿAbd al-Sattār (1986). Sharḥ Qānūn al-Ijrāʾāt al-Jināʾīyah. Dār al-Nahḍah al-ʿArabīyah, Cairo.
Dr. Ḥasan Muḥammad Rabīʿ (1993). Sharḥ Qānūn al-ʿUqūbāt al-Ittiḥādī – Al-Mabādiʾ al-ʿĀmmah lil-Jarīmah. Dār al-Nahḍah al-ʿArabīyah, Cairo.
Dr. Ḥasan Ṣādiq al-Marsafāwī (1971). Sharḥ Qānūn al-Ijrāʾāt wa al-Muḥākamāt al-Jazāʾīyah al-Kuwaytī. Jāmiʿat al-Kuwayt, Kuwait.
Dr. Ḥasan Ṣādiq al-Marsafāwī (1993). Al-Tajrīm fī Tashrīʿāt al-Ḍarāʾib, Al-Ṭabʿah al-Ūlá. Dār al-Maʿārif, Alexandria.
Dr. Imām Ḥasanīn Khalīl ʿAṭāʾ Allāh (2016). Al-Ḥimāyah al-Jināʾīyah li-Wasāʾil Taqniyat al-Maʿlūmāt fī al-Tashrīʿāt al-ʿArabīyah – Imārāt Namūdhajān. Markaz al-Dirāsāt wa al-Istiṭlāʿāt, Wazārat al-Dākhilīyah, Abu Dhabi.
Dr. Khalid Ḥāmid Muṣṭafá (2017). Sharḥ Qānūn al-Ijrāʾāt al-Jazāʾīyah li-Dawlat al-Imārāt al-ʿArabīyah al-Muttaḥidah. Dār al-Fikr wa al-Qānūn, Cairo.
Dr. Maʾmūn Salāmah (1988). Al-Ijrāʾāt al-Jināʾīyah fī al-Tashrīʿ al-Miṣrī, Vol. 1 & 2. Dār al-Fikr al-ʿArabī, Cairo.
Dr. Maḥmūd Najīb Ḥusnī (1988). Sharḥ Qānūn al-Ijrāʾāt al-Jināʾīyah, Al-Ṭabʿah al-Thāniyah. Dār al-Nahḍah al-ʿArabīyah, Cairo.
Dr. Muḥammad ʿAbd al-Gharīb (1990). Al-Daʿwá al-Madaniyyah al-Nāshiʾah ʿan al-Jarīmah. Cairo.
Dr. Muḥammad Abū al-ʿAlā ʿAqīdah (1988). Taʿwīḍ al-Dawlah lil-Maḍrūr min al-Jarīmah. Dār al-Fikr al-ʿArabī, Cairo.
Dr. Muḥammad Muḥyī al-Dīn ʿAwad (1999). Al-Mabādiʾ al-ʿĀmmah fī Qānūn al-Ijrāʾāt – Dirāsāt Jināʾīyah. Dār al-Maṭbūʿāt al-Jāmiʿīyah, Alexandria.
Dr. Ṭalʿat Yūsuf Khāṭir (2014). Inqiḍāʾ al-Khuṣūmah bil-Ṣulḥ al-Qaḍāʾī. Dār al-Fikr wa al-Qānūn, Cairo.
Hishām ʿAṭīyah Fahd (2018). Al-Ṣulḥ al-Jināʾī. Master’s Thesis, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Diyala University, Iraq.
Latīfah Ḥamīd al-Jumaylī (2013). Al-Wajīz fī Sharḥ Qānūn al-Ijrāʾāt al-Jazāʾīyah al-Ittiḥādī. Al-Āfāq al-Mushriqah lil-Nashr, Sharjah.
Maryam Ḥamīd Nāṣir (2018). Al-Ṣulḥ al-Jināʾī wa Atharuh fī al-Daʿwá al-Jazāʾīyah – Dirāsah Muqāranah fī al-Tashrīʿ al-Imārātī wa al-Miṣrī wa al-Urdunī. Master’s Thesis, Faculty of Law, Ajman University.
Muʾayyad Muḥammad ʿAlī al-Quḍāh (2012). Sharḥ Qānūn al-ʿUqūbāt al-Ittiḥādī al-Imārātī – Al-Qism al-ʿĀmm. Maktabat al-Jāmiʿah, Sharjah.
Muḥammad Sālim al-Zaʿābī (2014). Al-Jarāʾim al-Wāqiʿah ʿalá al-Sumʿah ʿAbr Taqniyat al-Maʿlūmāt. Dār al-Nahḍah al-ʿArabīyah, Cairo.
Rāmī Mutawallī al-Qāḍī (2015). Niẓām al-Murāqabah al-Iliktirūnīyah fī al-Qānūn al-Faransī wa al-Muqāran. Majallat al-Sharīʿah wa al-Qānūn, Jāmiʿat al-Imārāt al-ʿArabīyah al-Muttaḥidah, No. 63, Vol. 29, July.

Downloads

How to Cite

Ali Khalfan Hasan, Norfadhilah, & Hendun. (2024). الآثار القانونية للصلح الجزائي في القانون الإماراتي. International Conference on Syariah, Law and Science (CFORSJ I-CONF), 2(1), 197-230. https://alnadwah.usim.edu.my/cforsjiconf/paper/view/93