Alnadwah
International Conference on Syariah, Law and Science (CFORSJ i-CONF)

حقوق المتهم أثناء الاستجواب والمواجهة

Date Published : 10 December 2024

Contributors

Abdullah Muhair Alshamsi

Author

Norman Zakiyy

Author

Keywords

Interrogation Confrontation Guarantees Suspect

Proceeding

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): CFORSJ Procedia

Track

Article

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Abdullah Muhair Alshamsi; Norman Zakiyy;

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The study addressed the guarantees of interrogating the accused in Emirati and comparative law. The methodology of the study revolves around the analytical approach that presents the different legal and legislative frameworks in Kuwait and other countries related to the study topic. The researcher also uses the comparative method to identify the differences between Emirati legislation and other legislations in this field. The results of the study indicate that the right to defense is the basis of criminal justice fairness and is considered a key guarantee for it. The constitutional legislator in the UAE considers individual rights and freedoms as the basis of all freedoms and must be protected. The UAE law prohibits violating the guarantee of the accused's right to a lawyer and punishes the nullity of the act or procedure if it is done without the presence of the lawyer during the investigation. Based on the study results, the researcher recommends the importance of the UAE criminal law focusing on the suspect's right to a lawyer. All guarantees related to the right to defense should be considered during the evidence-gathering stage. The police officers are also advised to inform the suspect of the charges against him, the evidence presented against him, and the type of investigation being conducted with him. It is also suggested to activate a committee of experienced lawyers to spread legal awareness in the community and educate people about the right to defense in constitutions, international conventions, and professional rules governing the relationship between the lawyer and the accused. Finally, it is recommended that the guarantee of the accused's right to a lawyer continue even during the execution of the punishment and should be included in the prison regulations for inmates in disciplinary trials. The prisoner should enjoy the same guarantees and rights provided to ordinary individuals.

References

Aḥmad, H. ‘. (2009). Al-markaz al-qānūnī lil muttaham (1st ed.). Dār al-Nahḍah al-‘Arabiyyah.
Abū Khuṭwah, A. S. (2015). Sharḥ qānūn al-ijrā’āt li dawlat al-imārāt (Juz’ 1, 3rd ed.). Akādīmīyat Shurṭat Dubayy.
Al-Dahabī, I. G. (2010). Al-ijrā’āt al-jinā’iyyah fī al-tashrī‘ al-miṣrī (3rd ed.). Dār al-Nahḍah al-‘Arabiyyah.
Al-Qahwājī, ‘. ‘. (2019). Al-Nadb lil taḥqīq. Dār al-Jāmi‘ah al-Jadīdah lil Nashr.
Al-Qallālī, M. M. (2010). Uṣūl taḥqīq al-jināyāt (3rd ed.). Maktabat Muṣṭafā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī.
Al-Marṣafāwī, Ḥ. Ṣ. (2018). Al-Marṣafāwī fī uṣūl al-ijrā’āt al-jinā’iyyah. Munsha’at al-Ma‘ārif.
Al-Marṣafāwī, Ḥ. Ṣ. (2018). Uṣūl al-ijrā’āt al-jinā’iyyah. Munsha’at al-Ma‘ārif.
Ḥamad, Ḥ. (1999). Sulṭat al-taḥqīq al-ibtidā’ī fī al-qānūnayn al-miṣrī wa al-imārātī li al-ijrā’āt al-jinā’iyyah.
Arab Republic of Egypt. (1950). Egyptian Code of Criminal Procedure, Law No. 150 of 1950. Retrieved from https://manshurat.org/node/51209.
Arab Republic of Egypt. (2006). Law No. 145 of 2006 Amending Certain Provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Retrieved from https://manshurat.org/node/51209.
Council of Europe. (1950). European Convention on Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf.
Court of Cassation of Egypt. (1934, February 5). Judgment in Case No. 197. In Collection of Legal Principles (Vol. 3, p. 265).
Federal Supreme Court of the United Arab Emirates. (2004, January 10). Judgment in Appeal No. 266, Judicial Year 23, Shari’a Criminal. Abu Dhabi, 14.
Ḥusnī, M. N. (2012). Sharḥ qānūn al-ijrā’āt al-jinā’iyyah. Dār al-Nahḍah al-‘Arabiyyah.
Ḥusnī, M. N. (2012). Sharḥ qānūn al-ijrā’āt al-jinā’iyyah (2nd ed.). Dār al-Nahḍah al-‘Arabiyyah.
Jihād, J. Ḥ. (2019). Al-da‘āwī al-nāshi’ah ‘an al-jarīmah wa al-ijrā’āt al-taḥḍīriyyah li al-da‘wā al-jazā’iyyah (Juz’ 1). Al-Qiyādah al-‘Āmmah li Shurṭat Dubayy, Akādīmīyat Shurṭat Dubayy.
Kāmil, S. S. (2016). Sirriyyat al-taḥqīq al-ibtidā’ī fī qānūn al-ijrā’āt al-jinā’iyyah al-miṣrī wa al-faransī (5th ed.). Dār al-Nahḍah al-‘Arabiyyah.
Mahdī, ‘. R. (2018). Sharḥ al-qawā‘id al-‘āmah li qānūn al-‘uqūbāt. Maṭābi‘ Rūz al-Yūsuf.
Maḥmūd, M. Ḥ. (1999). Sulṭat al-taḥqīq al-ibtidā’ī fī al-qānūnayn al-miṣrī wa al-imārātī li al-ijrā’āt al-jinā’iyyah. Majallat al-Amn wa al-Qānūn, Akādīmiyyat Shurṭat Dubayy, 7(2), Yūliyū, 102.
Mana‘, M. Ḥ. (2019). Al-‘udwān: Ḍamānāt al-muttaham athnā’ al-taḥqīq wa madā murā‘āt mubādi’ al-qānūn al-dawlī li ḥuqūq al-insān fī al-majāl al-jinā’ī [Doctoral dissertation, Alexandria University, Faculty of Law].
Muṣṭafā, M. M. (1974). Sirriyyat al-taḥqīqāt al-jinā’iyyah wa ḥuqūq al-difā‘. Majallat al-Qānūn wa al-Iqtiṣād, 17(1), March.
Muṣṭafā, M. M. (2011). Sharḥ qānūn al-ijrā’āt al-jinā’iyyah. Maṭba‘at Jāmi‘at al-Qāhirah.
Muṣṭafā, M. M. (2015). Tatawwur qānūn al-ijrā’āt al-jinā’iyyah fī Miṣr wa ghayrihā min al-duwal al-‘arabiyyah (2nd ed.). Maṭba‘at Jāmi‘at al-Qāhirah.
Ramaḍān, ‘. S. (2015). Mabādi’ qānūn al-ijrā’āt al-jinā’iyyah (Vol. 1). Dār al-Nahḍah al-‘Arabiyyah.
Salāmah, M. (2012). Al-ijrā’āt al-jinā’iyyah fī al-tashrī‘ al-miṣrī. Marja‘ Sābiq, 504.
Salāmah, M. (2015). Qānūn al-ijrā’āt al-jinā’iyyah mu‘allaqan ‘alayh bi al-fiqh wa aḥkām al-naqd (Vols. 1–2, 3rd ed.). Maktabat Rijāl al-Qaḍā’.
Sarūr, A. F. (2010). Al-Wasīṭ fī qānūn al-ijrā’āt al-jinā’iyyah (Vols. 1–2, 10th ed.). Dār al-Nahḍah al-‘Arabiyyah.
Supreme Constitutional Court of Egypt. (1992, May 16). Judgment in Case No. 16, Judicial Year 13, Constitutional. In Collection of Judgments of the Supreme Constitutional Court (Vol. 5, p. 345).
United Arab Emirates. (1992). Federal Law No. (35) of 1992 Concerning the Criminal Procedural Law. Retrieved from https://elaws.moj.gov.ae/UAE-MOJ_LC-En/00_Criminal%20Procedural%20Law%20of%20the%20UAE.pdf.
United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights.
United Nations. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights.
Zaghlūl, B. S. (2015). Sirriyyat al-taḥqīq al-ibtidā’ī bayna muqtadayāt al-maṣlaḥah al-‘āmah wa maṭālib al-ma‘rifah: Dirāsah muqāranah (1st ed.). Dār al-Nahḍah al-‘Arabiyyah.
Zayd, M. I. (2016). Al-ishrāf al-qaḍā’ī ‘alā al-taḥqīq: Dirāsah maydānīyah. Al-Majallah al-Jinā’iyyah al-Qawmīyah, 20(2–3), 3 July 1977.

Downloads

How to Cite

Abdullah Muhair, & Norman. (2024). حقوق المتهم أثناء الاستجواب والمواجهة. International Conference on Syariah, Law and Science (CFORSJ I-CONF), 2(1), 157-179. https://alnadwah.usim.edu.my/cforsjiconf/paper/view/89