MENEROKA PERANAN QARINAH SEBAGAI KAEDAH PEMBUKTIAN DI MAHKAMAH SYARIAH: ANALISIS KES DAN CABARAN
Date Published : 20 December 2024
Contributors
Muhammad Nur Akmal Adib Abdul Samad
Author
Mohd Hanafiah Abdullah
Author
Dzafir Firdaus Ahmad Zubairy
Author
Suhaizad Saifuddin
Author
Lukman Abdul Mutalib
Author
Keywords
Qarinah
Circumstantial Evidence
Method of Proof
Syariah Court Evidence Enactments
Syariah Court
Proceeding
Track
Article
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Nur Akmal Adib Abdul Samad; Mohd Hanafiah Abdullah; Dzafir Firdaus Ahmad Zubairy; Suhaizad Saifuddin; Lukman Abdul Mutalib;
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract
This article examines the application of Qarinah in Syariah Court cases, referring to circumstantial evidence used to support or refute an allegation. Although Qarinah is accepted under the state's Evidence Enactments, its usage remains limited and is subject to the discretion of judges. Additionally, there is confusion regarding the application of Qarinah from an Islamic perspective and its interpretation within the enactments. The objective of this study is to analyze the concept of Qarinah and its application in Syariah Courts, identify weaknesses in its acceptance, and propose improvements to strengthen its use within the Syariah legal system. The study adopts a qualitative methodology through the analysis of primary and secondary legal sources, including statutes and court cases. The findings indicate that Qarinah carries several different meanings within the Syariah Court Evidence Enactments. Its application is also inconsistent with the Islamic understanding of Qarinah, leading to non-uniformity and challenges in its implementation. This article suggests that legal provisions be updated to provide clearer guidelines and improve the understanding of Syariah legal practitioners to ensure fairer and more consistent judicial decisions.
References
Abdul Qadir Idris. (n.d.). Al-Ishtbat bi Al-Qarain fi fiqhi al-Islami. Dar al-Thaqafah li Nars wa Tauzi'.
Adnan Hasan A'zaizah. (1990). Hujiyah al-Qarain fi as-Syariah al-Islamiyyah. Dar Aman.
Ahnaf Ahmad, Muhammad Helmi Md Said, & Ramalinggam Rajamanickam. (2022). Wasa'il Al-Isbat dalam Undang-Undang Keterangan Islam: Pemakaian Qarinah Dari Sudut Kes-Kes Kekeluargaan Di Mahkamah Syariah. In Muzakarah Fiqh & International Conference.
Ajmawati Binti Atan v Moriazi bin Mohamad [2005] 1 CLJ (SYA) 415
Akta Keterangan, 1950 (Malaysia).
Akta Keterangan Singapura, 2012 (Singapore).
Al-Bukhari, A. A. M. (1997). Sahih Al-Bukhari ma' Hashiyat Al-Sindi. Maktabah Al-'Asriyyah.
Al-Kasaniyy, A. B. (1986). Bada'i al-Sana'i fi Tartib al-Shara'i (2nd ed.). Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyyah.
Al-Mawwaq, A. A. M. (1994). Al-Taj wa Iklil li Mukhtasar Khalil (1st ed.). Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyyah.
Al-Nawawiyy, A. Z. M. (1991). Rawdat at-Talibin wa Umdat al-Muftin (3rd ed.). AL-Maktab al-Islamiyy.
Al-Qurtubi, A. A. (2002). Al-Jami' Li Al-Ahkam Al-Quran. Dar Al-Hadis.
Al-Zayla'iyy, F. (1892). Tabyin al-Haqa'iq Sharh Kanz al-Daqa'iq (1st ed.). Al-Matba'ah AL-Kubra AL-Amiriyyah.
Allen, C. (2008). Practical Guide to Evidence (4th ed.). Routledge-Cavendish.
Anwarullah. (1992). Islamic Law of Evidence. Pusat Dakwah Islamiah.
Anwarullah. (2010). Principles of Evidence in Islam. A.S. Noordeen.
Azman bin Johari lwn Hazirah binti Mohamed [Kes Mal No.: 11200-003-0278-2016]
Basudeo Gir v. State, AIR 1959 Pat. 539
Chandrasekaran & Ors v Pendakwa raya [1971] 1 MLJ 153
Eddyham bin Zainuddin lwn Rahimah bt. Muhamad [2015] JH Jld 40 Bhg 2 238
Eddyham bin Zainuddin lwn. Rahimah bt. Muhamad JH 40 BHG. 2 1436H
Enakmen Keterangan Mahkamah (Negeri Selangor), 2003 (Selangor).
Enakmen Keterangan Mahkamah Syariah (Negeri Sembilan) 2003.
Fathul Bari Mat Jahya & dll lwn. Majlis Agama Islam Negeri Sembilan & dll [2012] 4 CLJ 717
Fatimah Yusro, Anisa Che Ngah, & Mohammad Azhan. (2018). Penentuan Nasab melalui Prinsip Undang-undang Keterangan Islam. JUUM, 28, 57-66. https://doi.org./10.17576/juum-2021-28-06
Freckelton, I., & Selby, H. (2013). Expert Evidence, Law Practice, Procedure and Advocacy (5th ed.). Thomson Reuters.
Halijah binti Abdul Rahman v Zambree bin Baharom [2009] 1 CLJ (SYA) 402
Hisham Halim lwn. Maya Dato' Ahmad Fuaad [2018] 1 MSLR
Ibn Manzur. (2006). Lisan al-Arab. Dar al-Akhyar.
Ibn Qayyim al-Jauziyyah. (1977). Al-Turuq al-Hukmiyyah. Matba'ah al-Madani.
Ibrahim Mustafa. (1990). al-Mu'jam al-Wasit. Dar al-Da'wah.
Irwan Mohd Subri & Fakhrina Zulkiple. (2016). Analisis Fatwa Semasa Di Malaysia: Pandangan Pakar Dalam Keputusan Hukum Pengharaman Vape.
Junaidi Bin Abdullah lwn PP [1993] MLJ 217
Khalid bin Abdul Samad v. Ketua Pendakwa Syarie Selangor (2018) 2 SHLR 47
Kon Nen Siew lwn. Lim Siew Hong [1971] 1 MLJ 262
Linggam Sundarajoo lwn Majlis Agama Islam Kedah Darul Aman [1994] 2 CLJ 494
Lukman Abdul Mutalib, & Wan Abdul Fattah Wan Ismail. (2012). Qarinah: Antara Kekuatan dan Keperluan dalam Mensabitkan Kesalahan Jenayah (Zina). International Journal of Islamic Thought, 1(1), 18-25.
Mahmood Saedon A. Othman. (1990). Undang-undang Keterangan Islam. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Mahmud Saedon A. Othman. (2003). Undang-Undang Keterangan Islam. Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka.
Mahmud Saedon Awang Othman. (1991). Undang-undang Keterangan Islam. Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka.
Majallah al-Ahkam al-'Adilyyah. (1968). Matba'at Shi'arko.
Majlis Agama Islam Pulau & Seberang Perai lwn. Khatijah Yoan & dll [2010] 4 CLJ 592
Mohamad Ridzuan Zainudin. (2012). Pembuktian DNA di Mahkamah Syariah. Majlis Agama Islam Selangor.
Mohd Kamel Mat Salleh, Adibah Bahori, & Mohamad Azhan Yahya. (2021a). Fatwa sebagai rujukan dan autoriti di Mahkamah Sivil Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan dan Penyelidikan Fatwa, 11(1).
Mohd Kamel Mat Salleh, Adibah Bahori, & Mohamad Azhan Yahya. (2021b). Position of Fatwa in The Constitution: A Legal Analysis. Pertanika Journals, Social Science & Humanity, 29(4), 2171-2188.
Mohd Sabree Nasri, & Ruzman Md Noor. (2020). Kategori keterangan pendapat pakar di Mahkamah Syariah: Isu dan Cadangan Pelaksanaan undang-undang. Journal of Shariah Law Research, 5(1), 35-54.
Mohd Sabree Nasri, & Ruzman Md Noor. (2021). Pemakaian Keterangan Pendapat Pakar Sebagai Kaedah Pembuktian Di Mahkamah Syariah: Isu Dan Cabaran. Jurnal 'Ulwan Special Issue I: Kolokium Penyelidikan Ijazah Tinggi, 6(1), 172-192.
Mohd Sabree Nasri, & Ruzman Md Noor. (2022). Kerelevenan Fakta Menurut Undang-Undang Keterangan Di Mahkamah Syariah. Journal of Law & Governance, 4(1), 101-110.
Mohd Sabree Nasri, Mohamad Afandi Md Ismail, Mohd Al Adib Samuri, & Abu Suffian Abu Yaziz. (2017). Keterangan pakar sebagai cara pembuktian di Mahkamah Syariah. In E-Proceeding of the 4th World Conference on Integration of Knowledge 2017 (WCIK 2017) (e-ISBN: 978-967-0792-17-0).
Muhammad Hatta, Tengku Noor Azira Tengku Zainuddin, & Cut Khairunnisa. (2015). Role of the Doctor as Expert Witness in Medical Malpractice Case. In Proceedings of The 1st Almuslim International Conference on Science, Technology and Society (AICSTS) 2015.
Muhammad Hazim Ahmad, Ahmad Syukran Baharuddin, Mohamad Anwar Zakaria, Noraishah Nordin, Siti Khadijah Ishak, & Nur Khairina Othaman. (2020). Bukti Saintifik dan penerimaannya di Mahkamah Syariah; Analisis perundangan bagi undang-undang keterangan Mahkamah Syariah. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, 32 Kanun(1).
Muhammad Hazim Ahmad, Ruqayyah Razak, Nurul Syahirah Saharudin, Hendun Abd. Rahman Shah, Hasnizam Hashim, & Ahmad Syukran Baharuddin. (2019). Nafas Baru Kepada Tahap Pembuktian Qarinah Dalam Undang-Undang Keterangan Mahkamah Syariah. In E-Prosiding Diskusi Syariah dan Undang-undang. Fakulti Syariah dan Undang-undang.
Muhammad Juzaili Bin Mohd Khamis & dll lwn. Kerajaan Negeri Sembilan & dll [2015] 3 MLJ 513
Mustafa Ahmad Zarqa'. (1999). Al-Madkhal al-Fiqhi al-Am. Dar al-Fikr.
Mustafa Batcha lwn. A Habeba Abd Rahman [1410] JH 41
Noresah Baharom et al. (2010). Kamus Dewan. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Norhayati Binti Yusoff Lwn. Ahmad Shah Bin Ahmad Tabrani [2008] 27 JH (1) 33-50
Pembangunan Maha Murni Sdn Bhd lwn. Jururus Ladang Sdn Bhd [1986] 2 MLJ 30
Pendaftar, Perkahwinan, Penceraian dan Rujuk Orang Islam Daerah Melaka Tengah lwn. Mohd Sofian bin Mohd & Zaiton binti Aziz (Kes Mal No: 04500-042-0002-2008)
Pendakwa HEA v. Nasran b. St Kahar [kes jenayah, no230/88]
Pendakwa HEA v Razali b. Othman [kes jenayah no.122/89]
Pendakwa HEA v. Zulkiflee b. Jaafar [kes jenayah no.94/812]
Pendakwa Syarie Negeri Sabah v. Rosli Abdul Japar [2007] 23(2); JH 237
PP lwn Muhamed Bin Sulaiman [1982] MLJ 320
Ramalinggam Rajamanickam, Anita Abdul Rahim, & Anisah Che Ngah. (2012). Kedudukan keterangan pakar forensik di bawah Seksyen 45 Akta Keterangan 1950. In Proceedings of International Conference on Public Policy and Social Science. UiTM Melaka Malaysia.
Sarkar, S., & Manohar, V. R. (1993). Sarkar Evidence (9th ed.). Butterworths.
Shahnaz Bt Majid V Dato' Sri Mahmud Abu Bekir Taib [2018] 3 SLHR 15
Sidi Ahmad Abdullah. (1998). Pembuktian Dan Keterangan Dalam Undang-Undang Islam: Rujukan Khusus Kepada Qarinah. Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Soleh Ghanim al-Sadlan. (1997). Al-Qarain wa Dauruha fi al-Isthbat fi as-Syariah al-Islamiyyah. Dar Balansiah li al-Nasr wa Tauzi'.
Suhaizad Saifuddin, Ahmad Azam Mohd Shariff, & Muhamad Helmi Md Said. (2022). Keterangan Jenayah Syariah di Malaysia, Pemakaian Beban dan Darjah Pembuktiaan. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Suhaizad Saifuddin, Ruzian Markom, & Mohd. Munzil Muhamad. (2019). Kaedah pembuktian dalam undang-undang keterangan mahkamah syariah dan mahkamah sivil di Malaysia: Suatu kajian perbandingan. Kanun: Jurnal Undang-undang Malaysia, 31(1), 1-34.
Wahbah Zuhaili. (2004). Fiqh Al-Islami Wa Adallatuhu. Dar al-Fikr.
Wan Khairi Wan Azmi dan Farah Nurliliana Jauhari [2011] 1 CLJ (Sya) 344
Wong Chop Saow lwn. PP [1965] 1 MLJ 247
Zainul Abidin bin Mat Akhir lwn Ahmad Nazreen bin Zainul Abidin & Seorang Lain [2014] JH 40 (2)
Zulfakar Ramlee Saad. (2010, July 21). Pendakwaan jenayah sihir: Prinsip-prinsip pembuktian dan Akta Keterangan Mahkamah Syariah [Paper presentation]. Muzakarah Pakar: Pendakwaan Pesalah Sihir di Mahkamah Syariah, Shah Alam, Malaysia.
Downloads
How to Cite
Muhammad Nur Akmal Adib, Mohd Hanafiah, Dzafir Firdaus, Suhaizad, & Lukman. (2024). MENEROKA PERANAN QARINAH SEBAGAI KAEDAH PEMBUKTIAN DI MAHKAMAH SYARIAH: ANALISIS KES DAN CABARAN. International Conference on Syariah, Law and Science (CFORSJ I-CONF), 2(1), 521-533. https://alnadwah.usim.edu.my/cforsjiconf/paper/view/105